solution selling
Lessons Learned from GTM Consulting
For the past two years, I have performed part-time, contract go-to-market consulting. My wife had a surgery that had gone wrong 18 months ago, so I needed something that would allow me to take care of her, stay sharp, earn money, and help companies grow.
Most of the work was with small to midsize companies, but the problems and needs mirrored what I have encountered at larger companies. The main difference is that large companies tend to look to software to address problems. In contrast, smaller companies lack the budget for what they view as an unproven solution that increases complexity.
Here are my Top 5 findings:
- GTM plans are often developed at the highest levels, often in isolation, without market testing and validation.
- Sales teams are pitted against one another, rather than working together to help everyone achieve more (i.e., “A rising tide lifts all boats.”)
- Sales teams are focused on selling features rather than solving business problems.
- CRMs are not consistently used and often reflect idealized fiction rather than reality.
- Sales management and teams are not leveraging AI to help focus their efforts.
Here are the related Lessons Learned:
- Identifying common business problems and describing how your product or service solves them should be the foundation of the plan. Perform market analysis. How do companies describe those problems? Their terminology, often found in job ads, can help create effective messaging that resonates. Work to become the natural fit for what your prospects are seeking.
- Individual contributors get paid to win, but sales management needs to create incentives for collaborative efforts that lead to wins.
- For one company, I convinced them to implement a 2% SPIV (like a SPIFF, but team-focused) for every team member who actively contributed to team improvement. SPIV payments were quarterly, and there was a running total so the team could see the fund growth. Initial indications of a positive impact are good.
- Another benefit of collaboration is that it helps teams focus on approaches that work due to ongoing testing and refinement. Collaboration also helps teams focus on a more accurate ICP (ideal customer profile). Sales management can then feed their findings back to Marketing to improve and tailor their efforts.
- Selling is a byproduct of problem-solving. You can’t solve problems if you don’t know what they are. Every interaction with a prospect should focus on gathering information, building trust and relationships, and leveraging prior interactions to demonstrate that your solution will solve their problem and ease their pain.
- CRMs often either lack information or are full of wishful thinking. They focus on activities, and not progress and next steps. Using MEDDIC/MEDPICC as a foundation for reporting is a much better start. Sales managers need to independently validate the information to ensure their teams are being upfront and honest. Trust, coaching, and collaboration work together for the win.
- AI is not a panacea, but it is very effective for research, market validation, prospecting, and meeting preparation. Going in prepared builds respect and credibility, saves time, and lets you quickly qualify prospects in or out. There may be a nurturing program for some of the prospects qualified out for immediate deals, but your time is valuable, and you will go hungry chasing deals you can’t close.
So, what are your thoughts? Have you seen some of these problems yourself? How did you handle them? Let me know in the comments below.
And if you are looking for a Consultant to help your business grow or someone who can add immediate value to your team, then contact me.
Sales Discussions that Work
Selling is challenging work, and often, “we” (sales and marketing teams) make it even more challenging than it has to be. How many times have you seen a selling script, elevator pitch, or initial presentation that is long, boring, and undifferentiated? People have a short attention span, and nobody wants to interact with someone who does not listen to them or is pushy.
Your initial discussion is crucial to your success. Instead of going over a list of features, reading a slide deck, and telling why you and your product are so great, let’s try something else.
1. Understand why people buy. Any change has the potential to be difficult, risky, and painful. So, the pain they are facing has to be even greater, or they won’t bother changing. Your main job early on is to listen and try to understand their concerns. You may have a perfect solution, but if it doesn’t solve their pain, it holds little value to your prospect. This initial meeting is all about them.
2. At the start of the meeting, ask, “What would make this time well spent for you? What would you like to walk away from this meeting with?” Get them thinking about their problems and the value you may be able to provide, even if they don’t fully articulate them to you.
3. Ask questions and follow-up questions. People don’t lead with their significant issues, and someone unwilling to divulge anything likely isn’t a buyer. The more the prospect talks, the more you learn. So many sellers do not understand this simple concept. They want to dazzle you with features and demos – even if those things are not what the prospect needs.
4. Once you think that you have identified a pain, qualify and quantify it. For example, “You mentioned that your product release cycles are too long and complex. What is the business impact of that, and what would the impact be if you could reduce that time and effort by 50%?” Write that down, in their own words, because it could be vital later. If you manage to identify several pain points, review them and ask the prospect to identify the top three issues from the list, and ask why those three?
5. If you are giving a presentation, pull up the most relevant slide (customer problem/benefit slides work well here) and ask if this sounds similar to the problem they are facing. It can be a good starting point for getting the discussion moving in the right direction.
6. Don’t worry if you are not able to cover everything you intended, as long as the meeting is productive. I’ve also seen salespeople cut someone off and move on to a new slide rather than discussing something of substance. I was actually told once by a sales leader that five minutes of discussion is all that is required in an initial 30-minute meeting, because our goal is to pique their interest. That just doesn’t work.
7. Next steps. Keep in mind that your time is valuable, and qualifying out a prospect who is not a good fit is essential – it helps you avoid false hopes and lets you focus on people who might genuinely need your help. There are many ways the next meeting could go, but it’s best to ask the prospect. Would they like to expand the audience? Is there a specific issue they would like to address? Would they like a product demo or a technical discussion? Is something like a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) keeping them from opening up? Lack of engagement on their part is a huge clue. Be direct and ask the tough questions now to avoid wasting valuable time and effort later.
Here is a mini success story. In 2010, my team and I began selling the first commercial vector high-performance analytics database. There were several products already out that claimed to be 70x-100x faster than other products. Our pitch was supposed to be that we were 70 times faster than other products. That was self-limiting from the start and likely prevented people from contacting us.
After two months of minimal success (I closed a deal with a small hedge fund, which was the only sale in all regions), we started a weekly webinar called “Why Fast Matters.” The focus was on positive business outcomes rather than specific technology and features (“speeds and feeds”). We opened with some “What if?” statements, such as: What if you get answers from complex queries faster than your competitors? What if you could do that without the cost, complexity, delays, and limitations of a Star Schema or pre-aggregated data? What if you could do this on commodity x86 hardware? We would then briefly cover the breakthrough technology (which was a precursor to Snowflake) and offer a free half-day meeting with a consultant.
Within the first two weeks, we met with a company that was later acquired by PayPal shortly before eBay acquired PayPal. This company was about to spend $500K on a proprietary hardware expansion that would have only provided additional capacity for the following year. Their customers bought advertising based on queries against the last six months of their data. I asked the question, “What if they could query against five years of data and get answers faster than they do today? Do you think that would help them buy more advertising? Do your customers ever ask for this?” The response was that their customers frequently ask for 12 months of data and would be willing to pay more for these capabilities. Still, they did not have a way to do this cost-effectively.
I closed a $250K ARR subscription deal in two weeks, and they purchased $140K of commodity Dell hardware for our software to run on. They saved 20% over their planned purchase, and more importantly, they rolled out advanced querying capabilities (against six years of data) in less than a month. There was incredible value to them and their customers, and it generated more business for them. We would not have identified this need if we had primarily focused on features and technology.
As an aside, I was initially chastised for going off message, but after the Australian team adopted our approach and began closing deals, it became the new corporate standard. If something isn’t working, focus on finding ways to improve it. Even incremental change can be meaningful.
In the words of Tony Robbins, “If you do what you’ve always done, you’ll get what you’ve always gotten.”
Two Truths of Enterprise Sales
I have been selling products and services to large enterprise organizations for most of my career. I like to tell people, “Everyone is in sales,” because one way or another, they are.
Early in my career, I was a Systems Analyst for a Marketing company. I created what I’ve been told was the first custom coupon system for Subaru, as well as several systems for Mitsubishi Motors and Mitsubishi Electric. We would devise several ideas to pitch to the customer and then have follow-up meetings to flesh out the idea and help sell an extensive, multi-faceted program. It was a great learning experience in understanding what mattered and how to effectively upsell deals.
Standard sales advice is to sell to a known problem or a project. The thinking behind finding projects is that a tactical or strategic need has already been identified, with executive support and funding to address it. Most companies have some degree of dysfunction (which is why Patrick Lencioni’s books are so popular) that tends to affect projects negatively.
Focusing on problems is the way to go, but a business rarely comes to you to disclose those problems and their impact. A Consultative Selling approach is helpful in this situation. The upfront preparation can be time-consuming, but the results are often bigger deals that close in less time.
The process I use involves understanding the business, its customers, and competition, as well as potential changes to that business or industry. I will search for clues that indicate potential problems (from financial reports and filings to product-specific forum posts). I will then hypothesize about a few potential problems and reach out to the highest-level individuals in the organization likely to be responsible for these issues.
When you do speak with someone, you need to demonstrate your understanding and potential value add to learn more and begin gaining their trust while listening for validation or other information to refine your hypothesis. People buy from people they like and trust, and this approach becomes the foundation. From here, you can guide the process and expand your reach to other areas and layers of the organization. As a seller, your focus is on proposing real solutions that are mutually beneficial and have a high probability of success.
So, back to the two truths –
- Companies and teams are often biased toward the status quo and the familiar. Problems are rarely solved using the same people, products, and processes that got them into this position in the first place. Your focus as a seller needs to be on outcomes. Help them visualize what success looks like and how it feels. Overcome negative emotions of fear using positive emotions and envisioning a better future.
- Change can be expensive at first. It is an investment in the future that should yield both short-term benefits and long-term savings. Your focus as a seller should be on delivering value.
This approach and understanding can lead to new customer acquisition and ongoing account growth. You are continually demonstrating your value and commitment to your customers’ success, and that pays off.
Here’s a bonus third truth. If you cannot quickly gain consensus on the root cause problem(s) or traction with your proposed solution, qualifying out is often the best next step. Nurturing the prospect may lead to a future deal, but leveraging that 3-6 months on another prospect will likely result in more deals closed. Qualify out quickly and move on – that is better for everyone involved.
Remember, hope is not a strategy.
Where Ideas, Experiences, and Lessons Learned Intersect 