competitive advantage
Perspective and Expectations Establish your Starting Point
We may have seen the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic, and now I am seeing more and more articles about the “New Normal” and “Next Normal.” Interestingly enough, I have also been seeing a few articles over the past two weeks about this being an opportunity. Once the fear, uncertainty, and doubt (aka “FUD”) began to diminish, people finally began to look for a silver lining.
Fear is a powerful demotivator, so I find it interesting that some managers and executives use it to help achieve their goals. There may be short-term gains, but the long-term effects can be devastating. In times of chaos (real or perceived), one of the best things that a leader can do is be genuine and concerned for the welfare of their team, communicate in an honest and timely manner, and display confidence as a way to help shift emotions from a negative state towards a positive state. Fear holds you and your team back.
What I find interesting is that two months ago, I posted about this unfortunate time being an opportunity – something that led to several negative comments at the time. Three weeks ago, I posted about changes coming as part of the “New Normal.” I believe this is simply insight coming into play, which is one reason why Consultants, great Salespeople, and new Executives can often add immediate value to an organization.
As an aside, diversity of backgrounds, experiences, knowledge, expertise, and opinions lead to various perspectives- fostering creativity. The best team-building practice is finding people whose strengths help cover your weaknesses.
So, perspective and expectations determine where you begin and not where you will end. The benefit of having a better starting point is that you should be in a much better position to win. The best part is that you can teach yourself to become better at identifying different perspectives. You may find it much easier to understand the big picture of whatever problem you face with that new skill.
From time to time, we are all faced with situations that we know will suck. Avoidance may be an option, but it usually isn’t the best option. The military has a saying, “Embrace the Suck,” that essentially boils down to “just deal with it.” Focusing on “the gain” (rather than “the suck”), identifying the small wins along the way, and visualizing success is part of the process that I have personally found helpful to maintaining a positive attitude and an open mind. This simple process helps balance optimism with realism and, most importantly, creates high expectations.
So, what are your thoughts? Do you want to lead or follow? There is nothing wrong with following, especially when contributing to the team’s success. Perspective and Expectations are two tools that can help in any role.
Could a New Channel Model Lead to Sales Amplification?
Over the years, I have helped successful companies and start-ups improve and strengthen their Channel and Strategic Alliances programs. The results have been good, but could they have been better? Keep reading to learn about the benefits of enhanced business ecosystems.
Most traditional channel models support Distributors, Resellers, OEMs, and ISVs. The business mainly flows upwards to the main vendor. If that vendor has popular, widely used products (think Microsoft and Oracle), partner business can be good because the demand stays consistent. But sales pipelines suffer when that is not the case.
Sales Channel business is not the main source of revenue for most companies, but it does have the potential to become the largest and most scalable revenue source for nearly any business. Just think about the money left on the table by not adopting a growth mindset and executing a new and better strategy.
In the summer of 2016, I attended the “Sage Summit” in Chicago. It was impressive to see the Sage Group’s efforts to build, strengthen, and protect their Customers and Channel Partners community. They tried to foster higher levels of collaboration between the various types of partners – implementation services, consulting, staff augmentation services, complementary product vendors, etc. They had created their own highly successful Business Ecosystem, which is an excellent proof point.
When designing a channel partner program, my focus has always been on finding the balance between promoting and protecting partners’ business and helping ensure that end customers have the best possible experience (and have some recourse when things do not work out as expected). There are a variety of methods I have used to accomplish those goals, including creating a systematic approach to seeding relationships between partners complementary offerings and facilitating an even greater volume of business activity.
Nearly a year ago, I began working with a management consultancy run by Robert Kim Wilson, whose business vision is based on his book, “They Will Be Giants.” Links for this book and other relevant resources are provided at the bottom of the post. Kim asserts that Entrepreneurs with a Purpose-Driven Business Ecosystem (PDBE) are more successful than those without one, providing examples to prove his point. Having experienced Kim’s PDBE, I see how purpose fosters trust and collaboration.
As I did more research, I found that an increasing focus among thought leaders in this space has been placed on Business Ecosystems and Business Ecosystem Organizers (such as Sage in the earlier example). Those findings reinforced the PDBE approach, and external validation like this is always good.
From my perspective, it was just as important that this concept apply to businesses of any size – especially for small to midsize businesses. The fun part for me is exploring a specific business, analyzing what they do today, and quantifying the potential benefits of adopting this new strategy.
So, how does this new type of Business Ecosystem work?
- The Business Ecosystem Organizer expands the overall network, vets new “Business Ecopartners,” and provides a framework or infrastructure for the various Business Ecopartners to get to know one another, exchange ideas, and discuss opportunities.
- This can become an incredibly sustainable revenue source for companies willing to invest time to collaborate and share ideans in order to grow and support the Business Ecosystem.
- Business Ecopartners will have access to trusted resources to augment existing business and take on new, bigger projects by leveraging the available expertise.
- Suppose that you have products or services that work with commercial CRM (Customer Relationship Management), ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), or SCM (Supply Chain Management), and have seen a growing demand for functionality that relies on highly specialized technologies like:
- Cryptocurrency support.
- Blockchain for financial transactions and things like traceability in your supply chain or IoT data.
- AI (artificial intelligence) and ML (machine learning) to detect patterns and anomalies – such as fraud detection, Deep Learning/Neural Networks for image recognition or other complex pattern recognition.
- Graph databases to better understand a business and infer new ways to improve it.
- Knowledge Graph/Semantic databases to create deeper meaning and understanding with data from multiple sources – assisting in deeper understanding and Transfer Learning (which also has an AI tie-in).
- Building these practices in-house would not be practical or cost-effective for most businesses, so partnering becomes very attractive to your company.
- This type of business relationship can also be very attractive to a Business Ecopartner because someone else handles prospecting, sales, billing, account management, etc.
- Suppose that you have products or services that work with commercial CRM (Customer Relationship Management), ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), or SCM (Supply Chain Management), and have seen a growing demand for functionality that relies on highly specialized technologies like:
- Other Business Ecopartners can leverage your products or services for their projects and engagements, thus expanding their addressable market and becoming additional sources of revenue for the other ecopartners.
- By actively participating in this network, any business can now compete on imagination and innovation – providing a more comprehensive solution that could become a major source of differentiation from their competitors.
Value realized from this New Business Ecosystem model:
- These new sources of business and talent can become a real competitive advantage for your business.
- This becomes the source for Sales Amplification because each business is, directly and indirectly, expanding its reach and growth potential.
- The weighted (based on capabilities, capacity, responsiveness, and Ecopartner feedback) Business Ecopartner network model could lead to exponential business growth – a winning strategy for any business.
Next Steps
If this sounds interesting and you would like to discuss how it could look for your business, contact me to schedule an exploration call.
References:
- https://kimwilson5.wixsite.com/theywillbegiants/the-book
- https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/emerging-art-ecosystem-management.aspx
- https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/8-dimensions-of-business-ecosystems/
- https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-myths-and-realities-of-business-ecosystems/
- https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/operations/articles/business-ecosystems.html
- https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-56/accenture-strategy-your-role-in-the-ecosystem.pdf
- https://www.bain.com/insights/shifting-from-assets-to-ecosystems-video/
- https://hbr.org/2019/09/in-the-ecosystem-economy-whats-your-strategy
IoT and Vendor Lock-in
I was researching an idea last weekend and stumbled across something unexpected. My view on IoT has been that it provides a framework to support a rich ecosystem of hardware and software products and their usage. That flexibility and extensibility foster innovation, which in turn leads to greater use and adoption of the best products. It was quite a surprise to discover that IoT was being used to do just the opposite.
My initial finding was a YouTube video about “Tractor Hacking” to allow farmers to make their own repairs. That seemed like an odd video to appear in my search results, but it made sense about halfway through the video. There is a discussion about not having access to software, replacement components not working because they are not registered with that tractor’s serial number, and that the only alternative is costly transportation of the equipment to a Dealership to have a costly component installed.
I initially thought there had to be more to the story, as I found it hard to believe that a major vendor in any industry would intentionally do something like this. That led me to an article from nearly two years earlier that contained the following:
“IoT to completely transform their business model” and
“John Deere was looking for ways to change their business model and extend their products and service offering, allowing for a more constant flow of revenue from a single customer. The IoT allows them to do just that.”
That article closed with the assertion:
“Moreover, only allowing John Deere products access to the ecosystem creates a buyer lock-in for the farmers. Once they own John Deere equipment and make use of their services, it will be very expensive to switch to another supplier, thus strengthening John Deere’s strategic position.”
While any technology – especially platforms – has the potential for vendor lock-in, the majority of vendors offer some form of openness, such as:
- Supporting open standards, APIs, and processes that support some degree of portability and third-party product access.
- Providing simple ways to unload your data in at least one of several commonly used non-proprietary formats.
Some buyers may deliberately implement systems that support non-standard technology and extensions because they believe the long-term benefits of a tightly coupled system outweigh the risks of being locked into a vendor’s proprietary stack. But there are almost always several competitive options available; always consider all viable alternatives.
Less technology-savvy buyers may never even consider asking questions like this when purchasing. Even technologically savvy people may fail to consider IoT as a key component of everyday tools and services – thus failing to recognize the implications of a closed system relative to their purchase.
It will be interesting to see if deliberate business strategies like these change due to competitive pressure, social pressure, or legislation over the coming years. In the meantime, the principle of caveat emptor may be truer than ever in this age of connected everything and the Internet of Things.
Where Ideas, Experiences, and Lessons Learned Intersect 