Entrepreneurship
Presentation about Starting a Business and Entrepreneurship
It is interesting how often you see ads for franchise offerings that tout, “Become your own boss.” While that may not be all bad, it is just the tip of the iceberg. The presentation below is intended to provide insight to people considering starting their first company. This was from a one-hour presentation that glosses over many things, such as the need for registrations and insurance, but it could be helpful for a first-timer.
One of the first and most important lessons I learned when I started my consulting company long ago was that paying attention to cash flow was far more important than focusing on my balance sheet. Once you understand a problem, it becomes easy to change what you do to manage it. For example, using fixed pricing based on tasks where we received 50% up-front and the remaining 50% upon acceptance of the deliverable smoothed out cash flow, which was a big help.
So, take a look and post any questions that you may have. If one person has a question, many more will likely do as well! Cheers.
Commentary on an HBR article about Start-ups & Entrepreneurship
A friend posted this article on LinkedIn.com. Because of character limits for comments, I decided to post my response here. Below is a link to the article referenced: https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-a-startup-that-will-last
The article is interesting, but emphasizing “second and third acts” assumes that the start-up will successfully navigate the first act. Even with addressing what the author views as key points, this is still a very big assumption. The reasons for Longevity and Success are far more complex and multi-dimensional, but it highlights some of the more important areas of focus.
Long-term success requires several things: The right combination of having a unique goal that has the potential to make a big impact (think “No software” from Salesforce.com); Innovative ideas to achieve that goal; A diverse team to build the product (a mix of visionaries, insightful “translators,” technical experts, designers, planners, adept doers, etc.); Very good sales/business development/marketing to describe a better way of doing things and converting that to new business; and ultimately a management team focused on sustainable and scalable growth.
The point about the need to “Articulate a value framework oriented toward societal impact, not just financial achievement” seems superficial and too tactical.
First, most new technologies have unintended consequences. Social Media is a recent example, but Genetic Editing and AI are two areas that are likely to provide more examples over the next decade. Not every societal impact will be positive, and having a negative impact could very well lead to the untimely demise of that company.
Second, the two ideas (societal impact and financial achievement) are not mutually exclusive. When I owned my consulting company, we aimed to fund $1M of medical research to find a cure for Arthritis. We allocated half of our net profits to this goal. Every employee was on board with this because there was a tangible example of why it mattered (my daughter). We invested $500K and helped launch a few careers for some brilliant MD/Ph. Ds, and at least one national protocol came out of their research.
Mission and Vision are important to a company, yet many fail to view this as anything more than a marketing effort. Those companies fail to realize that this is as much about motivating and inspiring employees as it is about grabbing a prospective customer’s attention. These should be inspirational and aspirational, such as the “BHAG” (Big Hairy Audacious Goals) Collins and Porras wrote about 25 years ago.
Regarding Endurance and the assertion that “…the best businesses are intrinsically aligned with the long-term interests of society,” my take is slightly different. The best businesses look for trends and opportunities in an ever-changing global competitive landscape instead of looking to their competitors and trying to ride on their coattails. Companies with a culture of fostering innovation as a way to learn and grow (Amazon and Google are two great examples) can find that intersection of “good business” and “positive societal impact.” It is much more complex than a simple one-dimensional outlook.
But it was a good article to help reframe ideas and assumptions around growth.
One Successful Approach for Managing Innovation
When I owned a consulting company, we viewed innovation as an imperative. It was the main driver of differentiation, credibility, and opportunity. We had an innovation budget, solicited ideas from the team, and evaluated those ideas quarterly.
Almost as important to me was that this was fun. It allowed everyone on the team to suggest ideas and participate in the process. That was meaningful and supported the collaborative, high-performance culture that had developed. The team was inspired and empowered to make a difference, and that led to an ever-increasing sense of ownership for each employee.
The team also had a vested interest in having the process work, as quarterly bonuses were paid based on their contributions to the company’s profitability. There was a direct cause-and-effect correlation with tangible benefits for every team member.
We developed the following 10 questions to qualify & quantify the potential of new ideas:
- What will this new thing do?
- Be very detailed, as this was used to create a shared vision of success based on the presented idea.
- What problem(s) does this solve, and how so?
- This seems obvious, but selling this new product will be an uphill challenge if you are not solving a problem (such as “lack of organic expansion”) or addressing an immediate pain point.
- What type of organizations have those problems and why?
- This was fundamental to understanding whether a fix was possible from a practical perspective, what value that fix might have for the target buyer, and how much market potential existed to scale this new offering.
- What other companies have created solutions or are working on solutions to this problem?
- The lack of competition today does not mean you are the first to attack this problem. Due diligence can help you avoid repeating others’ failures by learning from their lessons and avoiding similar pitfalls.
- Will this expand our existing business, or does it have the potential to open up a new market for us?
- Each answer has upsides and downsides, but breaking into a new market can take more time and be more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive.
- Is this Strategic, Tactical, or Opportunistic?
- An idea may fall into multiple categories. When the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act became law, we viewed a new service offering as a tactical means to protect our managed services business and an opportunistic means to acquire new customers and grow the business. While this is not true innovation, it was an offering that flowed from this defined process.
- What are the Cost, Time, and Skill estimates for developing a Minimally Viable Product (MVP) or Service?
- What are the Financial Projections for the first year?
- Cost to develop and go to market.
- Target selling price, factoring in early adopter discounts.
- Estimated Contribution Margin Ratio (for comparison with other ideas being considered).
- Break-even point.
- Would we be able to get an existing customer to pre-purchase this?
- A company willing to provide a PO committing to purchasing the MVP within a specific timeframe increased our confidence in the idea’s viability.
- What are the specific Critical Success Factors to be used for evaluation purposes?
- This lesson learned over time helped minimize emotional attachment to the idea or project and provided objective milestones for critical go/no-go decision-making.
This process was purposeful, agile, lean, and fairly aggressive. We believed it gave our company a competitive advantage over larger companies that tended to respond more slowly to new opportunities and smaller competitors that did not want to venture outside their wheelhouse.
With each project, we learned, became more efficient and effective, and made better investment decisions that positively impacted our success. We monitored progress on an ongoing basis relative to our defined success criteria and adjusted or sunset an offering if it stopped providing the required value.
The process was not perfect…
For example, we passed on some leading-edge ideas, such as a “Support Robot” in 2003, an interactive program that used a pseudo machine-learning algorithm. It would be trained using historical log files, tested quickly and safely in a representative pre-production environment, refined as needed, and ultimately validated and rolled out.
This automation could have been used with our existing managed services and Remote DBA customers to further mitigate the risk of unplanned outages. Most importantly, it would have provided leverage to take on new business without jeopardizing quality or adding staff – thereby increasing revenue and profit margin.
At the time, we believed this would be too difficult to sell to prospective customers (“pipe dream” and “snake oil” were some of the adjectives we envisioned), so it appeared to lack a few items required by the process. Live and learn.
In summary, a defined approach to something as important as business needs innovation to grow and prosper, as best demonstrated by market leaders like Amazon and Google (read the 10-K Annual Reports to better understand their competitive growth strategies, which are largely based on innovation).
Implementing this approach within a larger organization requires additional steps, such as securing buy-in from a variety of stakeholders and aligning with existing product roadmaps, but it remains key to scalable growth for most businesses.
Good Article on Being an Entrepreneur
Nearly every morning, I start the day by reviewing news on business, technology, and finance/markets. Occasionally there is a general interest article that I stumble across. Today it was a short article about Curt Culver, Co-Founder of Culver’s Restaurants.
Several great points seem like common sense in hindsight but are often well out of focus during the “heat of the battle” as you build your business. Mr. Culver touches several of them:
- The Importance of having the proper Work / Life Balance
- For me personally, this was one of the toughest aspects of growing my business. I worked 100+ hours a week, traveled at least 50% of the time, and was often “not there,” even when spending time with my family.
- My habits also set expectations for others on the team, and I later realized this also created strife at home.
- The turning point for me was when my youngest daughter, then 4 years old, told her twin brother and older sister, “Daddy really does love us; he just works all the time so that we can live here and have all of this stuff.” It was painful enough to hear that, but it was a wake-up call about what is really important in life – people (especially family and friends), not “stuff.”
- For me personally, this was one of the toughest aspects of growing my business. I worked 100+ hours a week, traveled at least 50% of the time, and was often “not there,” even when spending time with my family.
- The Need to Develop others on your Team
- From past experiences, I understood the need to hire the best people you could afford – people with complementary skills (not just clones of yourself) and who were better than you in at least one aspect. That diversity added value, while the similarities made it easier to “get on the same page” quickly. From there, it was important to understand their goals and work together on career planning early – something that adds value to both parties.
- One of my goals in developing my team was to have everyone understand the big picture and empower them to make good decisions for the business.
- While most of this happened, my goal was for each and every person to think and act like an owner of the business. That level of engagement and accountability only happened with my most senior person, who was also my first hire and owned a small part of the company.
- The moment when I recognized success was during a mission-critical ERP system upgrade for our largest customer – a multi-billion-dollar semiconductor reseller. I sat in on project and team meetings, reviewed reports, and asked a few questions, but that was it. It was a very proud and empowering moment for me.
- The weekend of the pre-migration test, I received a call telling me that everything had been successful and that the migration was going forward the next weekend.
- The following weekend I received a nightly summary email, and on Sunday afternoon received a call telling me that the new system was operational and supporting production with ease.
- Culture
- Mr. Culver states, “Culture is all about people.” From my perspective, that is mostly true, but my experiences show other important dimensions of culture.
- To me, your company’s cultural identity starts as something aspirational and later grows into the glue that bonds every member of your team. It helps bring out the best in everyone, including camaraderie and support that come from working with people you like and trust.
- There were two unexpected consequences of actively focusing on culture, which were:
- We quickly transformed into a High-Performance Organization. Everyone pushed to continuously “raise the bar.” There was healthy competition, but each team member was a “safety net” for others. Winning as a team mattered far more than winning as an individual.
- New hires who were not a good fit were recognized quickly and usually quit within the first 2-3 weeks. I only had to terminate one person who wasn’t a good fit during the probationary period.
- There were two unexpected consequences of actively focusing on culture, which were:
- Having a Support System
- Mr. Culver addresses failure and the importance of family in supporting you in times of need.
- One of the biggest lessons I learned was that nothing that I did or accomplished with my company would have been possible without the support of my wife, children, parents, and in-laws (the latter two providing financial support during the early years in times of need).
- With understanding comes humility.
These are lessons learned that can be applied to any size organization and, in my opinion, are a great investment in your company’s future growth, value, and longevity.
The Importance of Proper Pricing
Pricing is one of those things that can make or break a company. Doing it right takes an understanding of your business (cost structure and growth/profitability goals), the market, your competition, and more. Doing it wrong can mean the death of your business (fast or slow), the inability to attract and retain the best talent, and creating a situation where you will no longer have the opportunity to reach your full potential.
These problems apply to companies of all sizes – although large organizations are often better positioned to absorb the impact of bad pricing decisions or sustain an unprofitable business unit. Understanding all possible outcomes is an important aspect of pricing, especially when it comes to risk and risk tolerance.
When I started my consulting company in 1999, we planned to win business by pricing our services 10%-15% lower than the competition. It was a bad plan that didn’t work. Unfortunately, you see this approach all too often in businesses today.
We only began to grow after increasing our prices (about 10% more than the competition) and justifying it with our expertise and the value we provided. We were (correctly) perceived as a premium alternative, and that positioning helped us grow.
A few years ago, when I took over sales for the Americas, one of the first things I did was analyze everything that was within my control. Pricing and SKUs were an unexpected surprise. Nobody had looked at this since the company was launched three years earlier. We had multiple items with a single SKU, and many customers were buying one product (and often one or two subscriptions) and using many – which was both a pricing and compliance matter. We had a gateway product that was half the price of our DBMS and allowed products to run on competitor products. I added SKUs, doubled the price on gateways so companies would have a fair choice, and increased several products by 3%-5%. Those changes added 7% to our revenue over the next year.
Several years ago, I had a management consulting engagement with a small software company. The business owner told me they were “an overnight success 10 years in the making.” He was concerned they might not be able to capitalize on recent successes, so he sought an outside opinion.
I analyzed his business, product, customers, and competition. His largest competitor is the industry leader in this space, and products from both companies were evenly matched from a feature perspective. My client’s product even had a few key features that were better for management and compliance in Healthcare and Union environments that his larger and more popular competitor lacked. So, why weren’t they growing faster?
I found that competition was priced 400% higher for the base product. When I asked the owner, he told me their goal was to be priced 75%-80% less than the competition. He could not explain why, other than saying he believed his customers would be unwilling to pay any more than that. His lack of confidence in his product became evident to companies interested in his solution.
He often lost head-to-head competition against that competitor, but almost never on features. Areas of concern were generally the company’s size and profitability, and the risk each posed to prospects considering his product. And despite this being an issue over and over, he never came up with a proactive approach to diffuse this before it became an issue.
I shared the graph (below) with this person, explaining how proper pricing would increase profitability and annual revenue, and how both would help give customers and prospects confidence. Moreover, this would allow the company to grow, eliminate single points of failure in key areas (Engineering and Customer Support), add features, and even spend money on marketing. Success breeds success!
In another example, I worked with the Product Manager of a large software company responsible for producing quarterly product package distributions. This work was outsourced, and each build cost approximately $50K. I asked, “What is the break-even point for each distribution?” That person replied, “There really isn’t a good way to tell.”
By the end of the day, I provided a Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis spreadsheet that showed the break-even point. More importantly, it showed the contribution margin and demonstrated that these products provided very little operating leverage (i.e., they weren’t very profitable even if you sold many of them).
My recommendations included increasing prices (which could negatively impact sales), investing in fewer releases per year, or finding a more cost-effective way of releasing those products. Without this analysis, their “business as usual” approach would have likely continued for several years.
Companies are in business to make money – pure and simple. Everything you do as a business owner or leader needs to be focused on growth. Growth results from a combination of factors, such as the uniqueness of the products or services provided, quality, reputation, efficiency, and repeatability. Many of these are the same factors that also drive profitability. Proper pricing can help predictably drive profitability, and having excess profits to invest can significantly impact growth.
Some customers and prospects will do everything possible to whittle your profit margins down to nothing. They focus on their own short-term gain, not the long-term risk they create for their suppliers. Those same “frugal” companies expect to profit from their own business, so it is unreasonable to expect anything less from their suppliers.
My feeling is that “Not all business is good business,” so it is better to walk away from bad business in order to focus on the business that helps your company grow and succeed.
One of the best books on pricing I’ve ever found is “The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making” by Thomas T. Nagle and Reed K. Holden. I recommend this extremely comprehensive and practical book to anyone responsible for pricing or with P&L responsibility within an organization. It addresses the many complexities of pricing and is truly an invaluable reference.
In a future post, I will write about the metrics I use to understand efficiency and profitability. Metrics can be your best friend when optimizing pricing and maximizing profitability. This can help you create a systematic approach to business that increases efficiency, consistency, and quality.
At my company, we developed a system that tracked how long common tasks took and tracked efficiency factors for each consultant. This allowed us to create estimates based on the type of work and the people most likely to do the task, and to fix-bid the work. Our bids were competitive, and even when we were the highest-priced bid, we often won because we would be the only (or one of the few) companies to guarantee prices and results. Our level-of-effort estimates were +/- 4%, which helped us maintain a 40%+ minimum gross margin on every project. This analytical approach helped our business double in revenue without doubling in size.
There are many causes of poor pricing, including a lack of understanding of cost structure; Lack of understanding of the value provided by a product or service; Lack of understanding of the level of effort to create, maintain, deliver, and improve a product or service; and Lack of concern for profitability (e.g., salespeople who are paid on the size of the deal, and not on margins or profitability). Each of the experiences listed above has been a great lesson learned for me, and can help you as well.
With a little understanding and effort, you can make small adjustments to your pricing approach and models that can measurably improve your business’s bottom line.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →
Where Ideas, Experiences, and Lessons Learned Intersect 