Uncategorized

Commentary on an HBR article about Start-ups & Entrepreneurship

Posted on Updated on

A friend posted this article on LinkedIn.com. Due to character limitations for comments, I decided to post my response here. Below is a link to the article referenced: https://hbr.org/2019/07/building-a-startup-that-will-last

The article is interesting, but emphasizing “second and third acts” assumes that the start-up will successfully navigate the first act. Even with addressing what the author views as key points this is still a very big assumption. The reasons for Longevity and Success are far more complex and multi-dimensional, but it highlights some of the more important areas of focus.

Long-term success requires several things: The right combination of having a unique goal that has the potential to make a big impact (think “No software” from Salesforce.com); Innovative ideas to achieve that goal; A diverse team to build the product (a mix of visionaries, insightful “translators,” technical experts, designers, planners, adept doers, etc.); Very good sales / business development / marketing to describe a better way of doing things and converting that to new business; and ultimately a management team focused on sustainable and scalable growth.

The point about the need to “Articulate a value framework oriented toward societal impact, not just financial achievement” seems superficial and too tactical.

First, there are unintended consequences to most new technologies. Social Media is a recent example, but Genetic Editing and AI are two areas that are likely to provide more examples over the next decade. Not every societal impact will be positive, and having a negative impact could very well lead to the untimely demise of that company.

Second, the two ideas (societal impact and financial achievement) are not mutually exclusive. When I owned my consulting company, we aimed to fund $1M of medical research to find a cure for Arthritis. We allocated half of our net profits to this goal. Every employee was on board with this because there was a tangible example of why it mattered (my daughter). We invested $500K and helped launch a few careers for some brilliant MD/Ph. Ds and at least one national protocol came out of their research.

Mission and Vision are important to a company, yet many fail to view this as anything more than a marketing effort. Those companies fail to realize that this is as much to motivate and inspire their employees as it is to grab a prospective customer’s attention. These should be inspirational and aspirational, such as the “BHAG” (Big Hairy Audacious Goals) Collins and Porras wrote about 25 years ago.

Image of globe with network of connected dots in the space above it.

Regarding Endurance and the assertion that “…the best businesses are intrinsically aligned with the long-term interests of society,” my take is slightly different. The best businesses are always looking for trends and opportunities in an ever-changing global competitive landscape instead of looking to their competitors and trying to ride on their coattails. Companies with a culture of fostering innovation as a way to learn and grow (Amazon and Google are two great examples) are able to find that intersection of “good business” and “positive societal impact.” It is much more complex than a simple one-dimensional outlook.

But it was a good article to help reframe ideas and assumptions around growth.

One Successful Approach to Innovation that worked for an SMB

Posted on Updated on

When I owned a consulting company, we viewed innovation as an imperative. It was the main thing that created differentiation, credibility, and opportunity. We had an innovation budget, solicited ideas from the team, and evaluated those ideas quarterly.

Almost as important to me was that this was fun. It allowed everyone on the team to suggest ideas and participate in the process. That was meaningful and supported the collaborative, high-performance culture that had developed. The team was inspired and empowered to make a difference, and that led to an ever-increasing sense of ownership for each employee.

The team also had a vested interest in having the process work, as quarterly bonuses were paid based on their contributions to the company’s profitability. There was a direct cause-and-effect correlation with tangible benefits for every member of the team.

We developed the following 10 questions to qualify & quantify the potential of new ideas:

  1. What will this new thing do?
    • It is important to be very detailed as this was used to create a common vision of success based on the presented idea.
  2. What problem(s) does this solve, and how so?
    • This seems obvious, but selling this new product will be an uphill challenge if you are not solving a problem (which could be something like “lack of organic expansion”) or addressing a pain point.
  3. What type of organizations have those problems and why?
    • This was fundamental to understanding if a fix was possible from a practical perspective, what the value of that fix might be for the target buyer, and how much market potential existed to scale this new offering.
  4. What other companies have created solutions or are working on solutions to this problem?
    • The lack of competition today does not mean you are the first to attack this problem. Due diligence can help avoid repeating the failure of others, potentially providing lessons learned by others and helping you avoid similar pitfalls.
  5. Will this expand our existing business, or does it have the potential to open up a new market for us?
    • Each answer has upsides and downsides, but breaking into a new market can take more time and be more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to achieve.
  6. Is this Strategic, Tactical, or Opportunistic?SOX Brochure Cover
    • An idea may fall into multiple categories. When the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act became law, we viewed a new service offering as a tactical means to protect our managed services business and an opportunistic means to acquire new customers and grow the business. While this is not true innovation, IMO, it was an offering that flowed from this defined process.
  7. What are the Cost, Time, and Skill estimates for developing a Minimally Viable Product (MVP) or Service?
  8. What are the Financial Projections for the first year?
    • Cost to develop and go to market.
    • Target selling price, factoring in early adopter discounts.
    • Estimated Contribution Margin Ratio (for comparison with other ideas being considered).
    • Break-even point.
  9. Would we be able to get an existing customer to pre-purchase this?
    • A company willing to provide a PO that commits to purchasing that MVP within a specific timeframe increased our confidence in the viability of the idea.
  10. What are the specific Critical Success Factors to be used for evaluation purposes?
    • This important lesson learned over time helped minimize emotional attachment to the idea or project and provided objective milestones for critical go / no-go decision-making.

This process was purposeful, agile, lean, and somewhat aggressive. We believed it gave our company a competitive advantage over larger companies that tended to respond slower to new opportunities and smaller competitors that did not want to venture outside their wheelhouse.

With each project, we learned and became more efficient and effective and made better investment decisions that positively impacted our success. We monitored progress on an ongoing basis relative to our defined success criteria and adjusted or sunset an offering if it stopped providing the required value.

The process was not perfect…

For example, we passed on some leading-edge ideas, such as a “Support Robot” in 2003, an interactive program that used a machine-learning algorithm. It was to be trained using historical log files, could quickly and safely be tested in a production environment, refined as needed, and ultimately validated.

This automation could have been used with our existing managed services and Remote DBA customers to further mitigate the risk of unplanned outages. Most importantly, it would have provided leverage to take on new business without jeopardizing quality or adding staff – thereby increasing revenue and profit margin.

At the time, we believed this would be too difficult to sell to prospective customers (“pipe dream” and “snake oil” were some of the adjectives we envisioned), so it appeared to lack a few items required by the process. Live and learn.

In summary, having a defined approach for something as important as business needs innovation to grow and prosper, as best demonstrated by market leaders like Amazon and Google (read the 10-K Annual Reports to gain a better understanding of their competitive growth strategies that are largely based on innovation).

Implementing this type of approach within a larger organization requires additional steps, such as getting the buy-in from a variety of stakeholders and aligning with existing product roadmaps, but it is still the key to scalable growth for most businesses.

Good Article on Being an Entrepreneur

Posted on Updated on

Nearly every morning, I start the day out by reviewing news on business, technology, and finance / markets. Occasionally there is a general interest article that I stumble across. Today it was a short article about Curt Culver, Co-Founder of Culver’s Restaurants.

Several great points seem like common sense in hindsight but are often well out of focus during the “heat of the battle” as you build your business. Mr. Culver touches several of them:

  1. The Importance of having the proper Work / Life Balance
    • For me personally, this was one of the toughest aspects of growing my business. I worked 100+ hours a week, traveled at least 50% of the time, and was often “not there,” even when spending time with my family.
      • My habits also set the expectations for others on the team, and I later realized that this also created some strife at home for them.
    • The turning point for me was when my youngest daughter, then 4 years old, told her twin brother and older sister, “Daddy really does love us; he just works all the time so that we can live here and have all of this stuff.” It was painful enough to hear that, but it was a wake-up call about what is really important in life – people (especially family and friends), not “stuff.”
  2. The Need to Develop others on your Team
    • From past experiences, I understood the need to hire the best people you could afford – people with complementary skills (not just clones of yourself) and who were better than you in at least one aspect. That diversity added value, while the similarities made it easier to “get on the same page” quickly. From there, it was important to understand their goals and work together on career planning early – something that adds value to both parties.
    • One of my goals in developing my team was to have everyone understand the big picture and empower them to make good decisions for the business. 
      • While most of this occurred, my goal was to have each and every person think and act like owners of the business. That level of engagement and accountability only happened with my most senior person, who was also my first hire and owned a small part of the company.
    • The moment when I recognized success was during a mission-critical ERP system upgrade for our largest customer – a multi-billion dollar semiconductor reseller. I sat in on project and team meetings, reviewed reports, and asked a few questions, but that was it. It was a very proud and empowering moment for me.
      • The weekend of the pre-migration test, I received a call telling me that everything had been successful and that the migration was going forward the next weekend.
      • The following weekend I received a nightly summary email, and on Sunday afternoon received a call telling me that the new system was operational and supporting production with ease.
  3. Culture
    • Mr. Culver states, “Culture is all about people.” From my perspective, that is mostly true, but there are other important dimensions of culture based on my experiences.
    • To me, the Cultural Identity of your company starts out as something aspirational and later grows into the glue that bonds every member of your team. It helps bring out the best in everyone, including the camaraderie and support from working with people you like and trust.
      • There were two unexpected consequences of actively focusing on culture, which were:
        1. We quickly transformed into a High-Performance Organization. Everyone pushed to continuously “raise the bar.” There was healthy competition between people, but each team member was a “safety net” for others. Having the team win was far more important than winning as an individual.
        2. New Hires that were not a good fit recognized that very quickly and usually quit within the first 2-3 weeks. I only had to terminate one person who wasn’t a good fit during the probationary period.
  4. Having a Support System
    • Mr. Culver addresses failure and the importance of family to help support you in times of need.
    • One of the biggest lessons I learned was that nothing that I did or accomplished with my company would have been possible without the support of my wife, children, parents, and in-laws (the latter two providing financial support during the early years in times of need).
      • With understanding comes humility.

These are lessons learned that can be applied to any size organization and in my opinion, are a great investment in the future growth, value, and longevity of your company.

Here is the link to the article referenced

Occam’s razor, our Maxima, and the Sage Mechanic

Posted on Updated on

My wife has a Nissan Maxima and loves her car. Over the past 9 months, there has been a persistent but seemingly random problem where the radio is used for a few minutes while the car is off and then the battery dies when she goes to start the car. This has happened more than a dozen times over the past 3 1/2 years, and it has been seen by two dealerships for a total of three times recently with no success – the most recent visit being one day before this problem occurred.

Saturday morning, I was running errands when my wife called and let me know that this problem had happened again (the second time this week, and she was very frustrated). I was pretty excited because this time, the problem occurred at home, not at some parking lot like usual, so I had the luxury of time to try to make a root cause determination. I’m somewhat mechanical but no professional, so I followed my consulting advice and contacted a professional.

Dave T. is a mechanical guru with an uncanny ability to offer sage advice with only a modicum of information. He is incredibly busy but always willing to spend a few minutes and give helpful advice. It helps that he is a great guy, but it also helps him generate business (leads and referrals). It is an approach that helps create a constant backlog of work and a very loyal clientele, which is good business.

I called Dave, described the problem, and mentioned what I had read on various forums (i.e., similar electrical problems observed after some arbitrary mileage). Next, I mentioned that this had just been to the dealership, and they did not find anything wrong. Dave laughed, stating, “There is a 99%+ likelihood that the alternator is bad, possibly both the alternator and battery.” He sounded very confident.

There was a pause, and then he asked, “What’s more likely – that there is some completely random problem that only happens when your wife is out and your son stays in the car and listens to music for a few minutes, which by the way only happens to Maximas after X number of miles, or that there are issues with the alternators where they tend to fail after a certain amount of use, which causes them not to charge the battery properly and leads to a condition where there is not enough of a charge to start the car?”

battery-cell-testing

When Dave explained it like that, I felt kind of stupid, consoled only by the fact that other professional mechanics had not resolved the problem before me. He added, “Anything that could drain a battery within a few minutes would be noticeable. It would start a fire or melt wires and smoke or smell. You haven’t seen or smelled anything like that, have you?”

I described my plan to troubleshoot the problem, and Dave suggested that I also test the alternator and the specific gravity of the individual battery cells. So, less than five minutes into that call, I had a plan and was off and running.

alternator-test-shot

Yesterday afternoon I spent several hours using a methodical approach to troubleshooting, documenting everything with pictures and videos to help me recall details and sequence if needed. Sure enough, Dave’s knowledge and intuition led to the correct conclusion.

I called him to thank him, and while talking, I wondered aloud why the dealership could not figure this out? Dave replied, “It’s not that they couldn’t have done what you did, but instead, they focused on the symptoms you described. The mechanic probably sat there for 10-15 minutes with the lights and radio on while the car was off. After that, the car started, so they assumed everything was fine.

I listened to what you said, ignored the randomness and speculation, and honed in on the likeliest problem. The fact that this happened again so soon also made sense because now your battery was run down from the testing performed by the dealership.” He added, “In my business, I get paid for results, so I can’t get away with taking the easy way out.” 

I’m big on lessons learned, wanting to make the most of every experience because I have learned that skills and knowledge are often very transferrable. As I thought about this, I realized that Dave’s analysis was the perfect practical application of Occam’s razor. It’s a very helpful skill as a Consultant, but more importantly, it can help when problem-solving in any line of work.