management

What is Customer Success?

Posted on Updated on

In most companies, it is a department or a team. I would argue that it should be foundational in a company’s culture. Companies need to focus on providing products and services that solve critical business problems for their clientele. By doing so, they create a predictable revenue stream and install base that supports future growth.

A tripod with legs titled, sales, products, and support, with the words Customer Growth, an upward trending arrow and a crown at the top. This sits on a base having the title, Customer Success Culture.

In a quarterly executive meeting a decade or so ago, the head of the Support organization stated this team was the most important. The head of Engineering then stated that her team was the most important. I chimed in and stated, “Without Sales, nothing happens, but ultimately, if all teams are not focused on the same objective, like a tripod, then all teams will ultimately fail.” Our CEO agreed, and that was the end of the discussion.

You could also argue that Marketing and Services should be included, and I would agree, since it goes back to all teams being focused on a singular, overarching goal.

In a previous post about creating Customers for Life, I wrote about a tactical implementation to address customer churn, which is the byproduct of failure in one or more areas. This was a wake-up call for me, as we were very focused on the success of our largest accounts and most productive channel partners – totaling 70% of our revenue, but we took the other “less valuable” accounts for granted. The lesson learned was that 30% of $62M is a large number, and by applying the same techniques to those accounts, we increased organic growth while minimizing churn.

Why Customer Success Teams Struggle

  • Lack of Ownership: They don’t own the accounts and often lack the motivation and accountability for each customer’s health and success.
  • Stay Reactive: They are reactive rather than proactive advocates for customers.
  • Lack of Resources: They are spread too thin and lack the capacity to actively engage with all but a few customers.
  • Enter Too Late: They are not introduced early in the sales process, which is a great way to demonstrate commitment to the prospect’s success if they select you as a vendor.
  • Stay Low in the Org Chart: They do not develop relationships beyond a small operational team, limiting executive visibility and expansion potential.
  • Ad Hoc in Nature: They lack formal processes, including detailed documentation, that help ensure consistency and continuity over time.

How to Position Your Team for the Win

  • SWOT: Review your strengths and weaknesses. Why do companies buy from you? (or, what are you really selling?) What are you known for? What do people like and appreciate? Where do you fall short? (opportunities for others) Accentuate the positive and focus on improvements where needed.
    • We often received customer feedback that when they called our support team, their problem was solved on the initial call. With other vendors, it often took 2-3 people to reach someone knowledgeable who could help. We promoted this when selling and reinforced the importance of maintaining this positive image to our internal teams.
    • We also received feedback that some of our technical features were lagging behind the competition, so my team and I helped identify the most critical features, then worked with Engineering to prioritize them and focus on bringing in new customers who needed them. It was a win-win.
  • Be Proactive: It is often possible to anticipate problems or make improvements based on your understanding of the customer and their history. Being part of the solution means that you don’t wait for the next problem to engage.
    • When I had my consulting company, we provided managed services for several large companies. We had proprietary monitoring tools that reported conditions that often led to outages if left unchecked. We addressed the issue and informed the customer once it was resolved. Our monthly summary report listed the likely outages avoided, the average duration of similar outages, and the cost avoided (based on the hourly cost of downtime). Key people saw our value at least monthly, so when it came time to renew our service, the process was fast and painless.
  • Become the Internal Liaison: The customer success team should serve as the main conduit for information. Introduce your Services or Engineering teams to the customer early. This doesn’t just solve problems; it uncovers new opportunities to provide value (and sell additional services) that position the customer for even greater success. Engagement and a sense of partnership go a long way.
    • I will often introduce the Services team when problems or needs arise. Their expertise and insights can be very valuable, often leading to services that position the customer for even greater success.
  • Go Above and Beyond: People remember that. Teams begin to rely on you. And Executives begin to see your company and products as critical to their success. This creates long-term value for your company.
  • Focus on the Future: Ask your customers, “How can we help with your upcoming initiatives and projects?” This is a great way to learn what they will be working on, to show your interest in their success, and to identify how your company and products can help them achieve it.

These are things that have been very successful for me when I was leading two large global regions, when I was a top Account Executive at a company with a small customer success team, and as a Consultant. I set expectations, led by example, and they began doing much more of what I expected from the customer success team. We started seeing improvements in the first 30 days.

While leadership doesn’t have to come from designated leaders, cultural changes usually require the commitment, involvement, and support of the organization’s top executives. Everyone can make a positive impact on a company’s direction and success.

When the customer wins and views you as a key partner, you don’t have to worry about churn.

Success is a Mental Game

Posted on Updated on

This assertion is as true in business as in sports, individually and in teams. So, let’s break it down.

Photo by RUN 4 FFWPU on Pexels.com

When I watch my local football team, I occasionally see a shift in facial expressions from excitement to frustration – often right before the end of the first half. Sometimes, they recover during halftime and come out renewed and ready to win, but the “gloom and doom” expressions usually translate into suboptimal performance and mistakes. It is frustrating because you know they have the talent to win. 

The same thing happens in business – especially in Sales. Sometimes it occurs in the middle of a sales cycle, similar to the example above. Unfortunately, too many people allow a few data points to determine their future trajectory. Why is that?

Whether you own a company or manage a group of people, good leaders aim to optimize their workforce by balancing factors that lead to happy, loyal employees doing their best for themselves, their customers, and their company. Many motivational theories exist, such as Expectancy Theory, Reinforcement Theory, the Role of Instrumentality, Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation, and more. Since one size rarely fits all, the challenge becomes reward-focused personalization, which can be a lot of work.

People will often win or lose before they even start. Their negativity, self-doubt, and anticipation of failure become a self-fulfilling prophecyThis post focuses on self-motivation, attitude, mindset, and creating the habits that lead to better success.

Below are four simple questions that someone should ask themselves when they question their ability to succeed in a position, company, or industry. There are always many ways to point the finger of blame elsewhere, but the first step should be to look in the mirror.

  1. Do you believe that you can win where you are today? If not, why are you still there? Customers and prospects can sense insincerity, so if you don’t believe in yourself, you shouldn’t expect them to believe in you. Maybe the company is terrible, and everyone is failing. If that is true, then it is probably time to look elsewhere.
  2. What have you learned from past successes and failures, and how have you adapted based on those lessons learned?
  3. What are some early indicators of success or failure that you have identified? Are you adapting to the situation if you run into those indicators now? The best approach may be to cut your losses on this attempt and move to the next sooner rather than later (i.e., qualify out quickly).
  4. What are you doing to improve your skills? It is funny how small, continuous improvement efforts lead to a greater sense of confidence. Greater confidence often translates to increased success.

I have found that consistently doing the right things is the best way to maximize my success. Start developing habits and routines that have led to winning in the past, but don’t expect them to work forever. Everything changes, and you should change, too. Look for what’s working for others, try it out, and if it works, incorporate it into your routines.

Success truly is a mental game, and everyone can win. The person who keeps winning over time is the one who doesn’t get stuck in time. Be curious, get excited, and adapt. And once you get there, start helping others. Having mentors is nice, but it is also great to become one.

As the saying goes, the rising tide lifts all boats. Winning can be a team sport, but it begins with individual contributors having winning attitudes. Unfortunately, the same is true of losing, so decide now what you want and move forward with energy and confidence.

Shouldn’t Sales Forecasting be Easy?

Posted on Updated on

Of course it should… or maybe not.

First, what are you measuring? The answer to this seemingly simple question is something that anyone with a sales quota should be able to succinctly answer, since this is what you are being paid on.

But context matters, too. People at different levels of the business are likely reviewing multiple forecasts for multiple reasons. So, the first rule is to never assume.

So, what are you measuring?

  • Bookings – Finalized Sales Orders
    • You have a PO, but has the deal really been closed? What else is needed in your business to finalize an order?
  • Billings – Invoicing Completed
    • This includes dependencies that may introduce unexpected delays and/or be outside of your control, such as a deal that bills on October 31st versus November 1st. Are they still part of the same period (October)?
  • Revenue – An in-depth understanding of Revenue Recognition rules is key.
    • How much revenue is recognized and when it is recognized varies based on a variety of factors, such as:
      • Is revenue accrued or deferred? This is especially key for multi-year prepaid deals, or when services are packaged with software as part of the deal.
      • Is revenue recognized all at once – such as for the sale of Perpetual Software Licenses? (even this is not always black and white)
      • Is revenue recognized over time – such as with annual subscriptions that are ratable on a monthly basis?
      • Is revenue based on work completed/percentage of completion? This is more common with Services and Construction. How is that percentage determined?
      • Are there clauses in a non-standard agreement that will negatively affect revenue recognition? This is where your Legal team becomes an invaluable contributor to your success.
    • Cash Flow – Is this really Sales forecasting?
      • The answer is ‘no’ in terms of Accounting rules and guidance.
      • But, if you have a start-up or small business, this can be key to “keeping the lights on,” in which case the types of deals and their structure will be biased towards cash flow enhancement and/or goals.
  • Profitability – In this case, what expenses are factored in that offset revenue?
    • Cost-Volume-Profit (CFP) analysis tends to be one of these exercises where you learn that there are often several takes on what is or is not a related expense.

When I was a VP running two global regions, I would meet with the CFO prior to the end of a quarter to discuss what mattered most for the coming quarter. Sometimes the goal was more upfront cash; other times, it was guaranteed multi-year revenue. Sometimes it could be both, and I would be authorized to provide additional discounts on prepaid multi-year deals. The goals would change based on our banking covenants (revenue, investments, cash on hand), investor goals, valuations, etc. I often tracked multiple goals at once for various reasons.

My advice is to work closely with your CFO, Finance Team, Sales/Revenue Operations Team, and Legal team to understand their goals and guidelines, then take that one step further by creating policies approved by those stakeholders and share the highlights with the Sales team to avoid any ambiguity around pricing rules, process changes, and expectations. Great communication and a common understanding of the goals and rules help you and your team win.

So, now the hard part is over, right?

Diagram showing upward trend over the word Sales.

It could be that easy if you have one well-established product, a stable install base, no real competitive threats, a steady, predictable growth or decline rate, and consistent pricing and average deal sizes. I haven’t seen a business like that yet, but I’m sure at least a few exist.

Next, what are you building into your model to maximize accuracy? Every product or service may be driven by independent factors, so a flat model that evenly distributes sales over time (monthly or quarterly) is likely to be inaccurate when you have royalty revenue or progress-based billings.

For example:

  • One product line that sells perpetual licenses may depend on release cycles every 18-36 months to maintain a steady revenue rate, with peaks and valleys within that window.
  • A second product line may be driven mainly by renewals and expansion on fairly stable timelines and billings. In this case, annual uplifts may be needed to maintain profitability.
  • A third product line may be new with no track record and in a competitive space – meaning that even the best projections will be speculative and likely optimistic.
  • Finally, services could be associated with each product line and driven by more dependent and independent factors (new implementations, upgrades, implementing new features, platform changes and modernization, routine engagements, training, etc.) How and when are the revenue and expenses recognized, and what impact could they have with related items sold with (or close to) that deal?

Historical trends are one important factor to consider, especially because they tend to be the things you have the greatest control over (i.e., they should not change that much). This starts with high-level sales conversion rates and goes down to average sales cycle, seasonal trends, organic growth rates, churn rates, and more.

Having accurate sales and customer data over time that can be accurately correlated is extremely helpful. But factors such as Product SKU changes, licensing model changes, new product bundles, etc., increase the complexity of that effort and potentially decrease the accuracy of your results. These self-inflicted issues are often introduced without considering downstream implications. Fun!

Correlating those trends to external factors, such as overall growth of the market, relative growth of competitors, economic indicators (inflation metrics like CPI, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, corporate indicators (profits, earns per share, distributions, various ratios, ratings, etc.), commodity and futures prices (especially if you install base tends to skew towards something like the Petroleum Industry), specific events, and so forth increases the complexity of the model but can add an extra level of accuracy.

The best case is that those correlations increase your forecasting accuracy for the entire year. In all likelihood, they provide valuable inputs that allow you to dynamically adjust sales plans as needed to ensure year-over-year success. But making those changes should not be done in a vacuum, and communicating the potential need for changes like that should be done at the earliest point where you have a fair degree of confidence that change is needed. Simple, eh?

Unexpected events will always negatively impact your forecasts and plans. Changes to the competitive landscape, reputational changes, economic changes, etc., can all occur quickly and with “little notice.” That is especially true if you are not actively looking for subtle indicators (leading and trailing) and nuances that highlight potential problems and give you time to do as much as possible to address them proactively. The best advice is to anticipate the unexpected and have a contingency plan!

Forecasting accuracy drives confidence, which helps you secure funding for new campaigns or initiatives. Surprises, even positive ones, are generally disliked because the results differ from expectations, which can fuel other doubts and concerns.

Confidence comes from understanding, good planning, helping everyone meet a quota, and supporting teams to do what is needed, when it is needed, to optimize the process. This also assumes you can determine whether deals are really on track and intervene with guidance before deals slip or are lost.

It may not be easy, but it helps drive companies to the next level through a predictable, sustainable growth trajectory. In the end, that consistency often matters the most to the owners and stakeholders of a business.

The Value Created by a Strong Team

Posted on Updated on

I participated in an amazing team-building exercise as a Board Member for the Children’s Hospital Foundation of Wisconsin. We were heading down a path that would lead to a decision on whether to invest $150M in a new addition. The CEO at the time, Jon Vice, wisely determined that each committee needed strong teams to thoroughly vet the idea from every possible perspective.

Canada Geese flying in a V formation with a brightly colored but dark sky background
Purpose-driven teamwork. An amazing photo by Joe Daniel Price found on TheWallpaper.co

The process started with being given a book to read (“Now, Discover Your Strengths” by Marcus Buckingham & Donald O. Clifton, Ph.D.) and then completing the “StrengthsFinder” assessment using a code provided in the book. The goal was to understand gaps in perception (how you view yourself vs. how others view you) so you could better understand your strengths and weaknesses. Then, teams were created with people having complementary skills to help eliminate weaknesses from the overall team perspective. The results were impressive.

Over my career, I have been involved in many team-building exercises and events – some of which provided useful insights. However, most failed to combine the findings meaningfully, provide useful context, or offer actionable recommendations. Key areas that were consistently omitted were Organizational Culture, Organizational Politics, and Leadership. Those three areas significantly impact value creation vis-à-vis team effectiveness and commitment.

When I ran my consulting company, we had a small core team of business and technology consultants and leveraged subcontractors and an outsourcing company to take on more concurrent projects, as well as larger, more complex ones. This approach worked for three reasons:

  1. We had developed a High-Performance Culture that was based on:
    • Purpose: A common vision of success, understanding why that mattered, and understanding how that was defined and measured.
    • Ownership: Taking responsibility for something and being accountable for the outcome. This included responsibility for the extended team of contractors. Standardized procedures helped ensure consistency and make it easier for each person to accept responsibility for “their team.”
    • Trust: Everyone understood that to be effective and responsive, they needed to trust and support each other and trust each other’s judgment. If there was a concern, we focused on context and process improvements to understand what happened and implement changes based on lessons learned. We avoided personal attacks for the good of the entire team.
  2. Empowerment: Everyone understood that decision-making involves risk, while also recognizing that delaying an important decision could be costly and create more risk. Therefore, each member was responsible for making good decisions as needed and communicating changes to the rest of the team.
  3. Clear and Open Communication: The team was very transparent and honest. When an issue came up, they tried to resolve it with that person first, then escalated if they couldn’t reach an agreement and decided to seek the team’s consensus. Everything was out in the open and done in a constructive, collaborative spirit.

People who were not a good fit would quickly wash out, so our core team consisted of trusted experts. A friendly competition helped raise the bar for the entire team, but when needed, the other team members became a safety net for each other.

We were all focused on the same goal, and everyone realized the only way to succeed was to work together. Win or lose, we did it together. The strength of our team created tremendous value – internally and for our customers that we sustained for several years. That value included innovation, higher levels of productivity and profitability, and an extremely high success rate.

This approach can work at any level but is most effective when it starts at the top. When employees see their company leaders behaving this way, it provides a model and sets expectations for everyone under them. If there is dysfunction within an organization, it often starts at the top – by promoting or accepting behaviors that do not benefit the whole of the organization. With a strong and positive organizational culture, the value of strong teams is multiplied and becomes an incredible competitive advantage.