leadership
Failing Productively
As an entrepreneur, you will typically get advice like, “Fail fast and fail often.” I always found this somewhat amusing, similar to the saying, “It takes money to make money” (a lot of bad investments are made using that philosophy). Living this yourself is an amazing experience – especially when things turn out well. But as I have written about before, you learn as much from the good experiences as you do from the bad ones.
Innovating is tough. You need people who always think of different and better ways of doing things or question why something has to be done or made a certain way. It means shifting away from the “how” and “why” and focusing on the “what” (outcomes). It takes confidence to ask questions that many would view as stupid (“Why would you do that? It’s always been done this way.”) But when you have the right mix of people and culture, amazing things can and do happen, and it feels great.
Innovating takes a willingness to lose time and money, hoping to win something big enough later to make it all worthwhile. This is where many companies fall short because they lack the patience, budget, or appetite to fail. I believe this is why innovation often comes from small companies and small teams. For them, the prospect of doing something cool or making a big impact is motivation enough to try something, and the barriers to getting started are often much lower.
It also takes a lot of discipline to follow a plan when a project appears to be failing, but it takes even more discipline to kill a project that has demonstrated real potential but isn’t meeting expectations. That was one of my first and probably most important lessons learned in this area. Let me explain…
In 2000, we looked at franchising our “Consulting System” – processes, procedures, tools, metrics, etc., developed and proven in my business. We believed this approach could help average consultants deliver above-average work products in less time. The idea seemed to have real potential.
Finding an attorney who would even consider this idea took a lot of work. Most believed it would be impossible to proceduralize a somewhat ambiguous task like solving a business or technical problem. We finally found an attorney who, after a 2-hour no-cost interview, agreed to work with us. When asked about his approach, he replied, “I did not want to waste my [his] time or our money on a fool’s errand.”
We estimated it would take 12 months and cost approximately $100,000 to fully develop our consulting system. We met with potential prospects to validate the idea (it would have been illegal to pre-sell the system) and then got to work. Twelve months turned into 18, and the original $100K budget increased nearly 50%. All indications were positive, and we felt very good about the success and business potential of this effort.
Then, the terror attacks occurred on Sept. 11th, and businesses everywhere saw a decline. In early 2002, we reevaluated the project and felt that it could be completed within the next 6-8 months and would cost another $50K+. Our confidence was high.
After a long and emotional debate, we decided to kill the project – not because we felt it would not work, but because there was less of a target market, and now the payback period (time to value) would double or triple. This was one of the most difficult business decisions that I ever made.
A big lesson learned from this experience was that our approach needed to be more analytical.
- From that point forward, we created a budget for “time off” (we bought our own time, rather than waiting for bench time) and other project-related items.
- We developed a simple system to collect and track ideas and feedback. When an idea felt right, we took the next steps and created a plan with a defined budget, milestones, and timeline. If the project failed to meet any defined objectives, it would be killed – No questions asked.
- We documented what we did, why we did it, our goals, and expected outcomes and timelines. Regardless of success or failure, we would conduct postmortem reviews to learn and document as much as possible from every effort and investment.
We still had failures, but with each one, we took less time and spent less money. More importantly, we learned how to do this better, which enhanced our resilience and helped us realize several successes. It gave us both the structure and the freedom to create amazing things. Since failure was an acceptable outcome, we never feared it.
This approach was more than just “failing fast and failing often”; it was “intelligent failure,” and it served us well for nearly a decade.
Profitability through Operational Efficiency
In my last post, I discussed the importance of proper pricing for profitability and success. As most people know, you increase profitability by increasing revenue and/or decreasing costs. However, cost reduction does not necessarily mean slashing headcount, wages, benefits, or other factors that often hurt morale and cascade into lower quality and customer satisfaction. There is often a better way.
The best businesses generally focus on repeatability and reliability, realizing that the more you do something, the better you get at doing it well. You develop a compelling selling story based on past successes, build a solid reference base, and identify the sweet spot from a pricing perspective. People keep buying what you are selling, and if your pricing is right, money is available at the end of the month to fund organic growth and operational efficiency efforts.
Finding ways to increase operational efficiency is the ideal way to reduce costs, but it takes time and effort. Sometimes this happens through increased experience and skill. But, often optimization occurs through standardization and automation. Develop a system that works well, apply it consistently, measure and analyze the results, and then make changes to improve the process. An added benefit is that this approach increases quality, making your offering even more attractive.
Metrics should be collected at a “work package” level or lower (e.g., task level), which means they are related tasks at the lowest level that produce a discrete deliverable. This project management concept works whether you are manufacturing something (although a Bill of Materials may be a better analogy in this segment), building something, or creating something. This allows you to accurately create and validate cost and time estimates. At this level of detail, it becomes easier to identify ways to simplify or automate the process.
When I ran my company, we used this approach to win more business with competitive fixed-price project bids that provided healthy profit margins while minimizing risk for our clients. Higher profit margins let us invest in our own growth and success by funding ongoing employee training and education, innovation efforts, and international expansion, as well as experimenting with new things (products, technology, methodology, etc.) that were fun and often taught us something valuable.
Those growth activities were only possible because we focused on doing everything as efficiently and effectively as possible, learning from everything we did – good and bad – and having a tangible way to measure and prove that we were constantly improving.
Think like a CEO, act like a COO, and measure like a CFO. Do this and make a real difference in your own business!
The Importance of Proper Pricing
Pricing is one of those things that can make or break a company. Doing it right takes an understanding of your business (cost structure and growth/profitability goals), the market, your competition, and more. Doing it wrong can mean the death of your business (fast or slow), the inability to attract and retain the best talent, and creating a situation where you will no longer have the opportunity to reach your full potential.
These problems apply to companies of all sizes – although large organizations are often better positioned to absorb the impact of bad pricing decisions or sustain an unprofitable business unit. Understanding all possible outcomes is an important aspect of pricing, especially when it comes to risk and risk tolerance.
When I started my consulting company in 1999, we planned to win business by pricing our services 10%-15% lower than the competition. It was a bad plan that didn’t work. Unfortunately, you see this approach all too often in businesses today.
We only began to grow after increasing our prices (about 10% more than the competition) and justifying it with our expertise and the value we provided. We were (correctly) perceived as a premium alternative, and that positioning helped us grow.
A few years ago, when I took over sales for the Americas, one of the first things I did was analyze everything that was within my control. Pricing and SKUs were an unexpected surprise. Nobody had looked at this since the company was launched three years earlier. We had multiple items with a single SKU, and many customers were buying one product (and often one or two subscriptions) and using many – which was both a pricing and compliance matter. We had a gateway product that was half the price of our DBMS and allowed products to run on competitor products. I added SKUs, doubled the price on gateways so companies would have a fair choice, and increased several products by 3%-5%. Those changes added 7% to our revenue over the next year.
Several years ago, I had a management consulting engagement with a small software company. The business owner told me they were “an overnight success 10 years in the making.” He was concerned they might not be able to capitalize on recent successes, so he sought an outside opinion.
I analyzed his business, product, customers, and competition. His largest competitor is the industry leader in this space, and products from both companies were evenly matched from a feature perspective. My client’s product even had a few key features that were better for management and compliance in Healthcare and Union environments that his larger and more popular competitor lacked. So, why weren’t they growing faster?
I found that competition was priced 400% higher for the base product. When I asked the owner, he told me their goal was to be priced 75%-80% less than the competition. He could not explain why, other than saying he believed his customers would be unwilling to pay any more than that. His lack of confidence in his product became evident to companies interested in his solution.
He often lost head-to-head competition against that competitor, but almost never on features. Areas of concern were generally the company’s size and profitability, and the risk each posed to prospects considering his product. And despite this being an issue over and over, he never came up with a proactive approach to diffuse this before it became an issue.
I shared the graph (below) with this person, explaining how proper pricing would increase profitability and annual revenue, and how both would help give customers and prospects confidence. Moreover, this would allow the company to grow, eliminate single points of failure in key areas (Engineering and Customer Support), add features, and even spend money on marketing. Success breeds success!
In another example, I worked with the Product Manager of a large software company responsible for producing quarterly product package distributions. This work was outsourced, and each build cost approximately $50K. I asked, “What is the break-even point for each distribution?” That person replied, “There really isn’t a good way to tell.”
By the end of the day, I provided a Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) analysis spreadsheet that showed the break-even point. More importantly, it showed the contribution margin and demonstrated that these products provided very little operating leverage (i.e., they weren’t very profitable even if you sold many of them).
My recommendations included increasing prices (which could negatively impact sales), investing in fewer releases per year, or finding a more cost-effective way of releasing those products. Without this analysis, their “business as usual” approach would have likely continued for several years.
Companies are in business to make money – pure and simple. Everything you do as a business owner or leader needs to be focused on growth. Growth results from a combination of factors, such as the uniqueness of the products or services provided, quality, reputation, efficiency, and repeatability. Many of these are the same factors that also drive profitability. Proper pricing can help predictably drive profitability, and having excess profits to invest can significantly impact growth.
Some customers and prospects will do everything possible to whittle your profit margins down to nothing. They focus on their own short-term gain, not the long-term risk they create for their suppliers. Those same “frugal” companies expect to profit from their own business, so it is unreasonable to expect anything less from their suppliers.
My feeling is that “Not all business is good business,” so it is better to walk away from bad business in order to focus on the business that helps your company grow and succeed.
One of the best books on pricing I’ve ever found is “The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Profitable Decision Making” by Thomas T. Nagle and Reed K. Holden. I recommend this extremely comprehensive and practical book to anyone responsible for pricing or with P&L responsibility within an organization. It addresses the many complexities of pricing and is truly an invaluable reference.
In a future post, I will write about the metrics I use to understand efficiency and profitability. Metrics can be your best friend when optimizing pricing and maximizing profitability. This can help you create a systematic approach to business that increases efficiency, consistency, and quality.
At my company, we developed a system that tracked how long common tasks took and tracked efficiency factors for each consultant. This allowed us to create estimates based on the type of work and the people most likely to do the task, and to fix-bid the work. Our bids were competitive, and even when we were the highest-priced bid, we often won because we would be the only (or one of the few) companies to guarantee prices and results. Our level-of-effort estimates were +/- 4%, which helped us maintain a 40%+ minimum gross margin on every project. This analytical approach helped our business double in revenue without doubling in size.
There are many causes of poor pricing, including a lack of understanding of cost structure; Lack of understanding of the value provided by a product or service; Lack of understanding of the level of effort to create, maintain, deliver, and improve a product or service; and Lack of concern for profitability (e.g., salespeople who are paid on the size of the deal, and not on margins or profitability). Each of the experiences listed above has been a great lesson learned for me, and can help you as well.
With a little understanding and effort, you can make small adjustments to your pricing approach and models that can measurably improve your business’s bottom line.
Lessons Learned from Small Business Ownership
I learned many valuable lessons over the course of the 8+ years that I owned my consulting business. Many were positive, a few were negative, but all were educational. These lessons shaped my perceptions about and approaches to business, and have served me well. This post will just be the first of many on the topic.
My lessons learned covered many topics: How to structure the business; Business Goals; Risk; Growth Initiatives and Investment; Employees and Benefits; Developing a High-Performance Culture; Marketing and Selling; Hiring and Firing; Bringing in Experts; Partners and Contractors; The need to let go; Exit Strategies and more.
In my case, these lessons learned were compounded by efforts to start a franchise for the consulting system we developed, and then our expansion to the UK with all of the challenges associated with international business. Each new effort built on the success and lessons learned from those previous efforts.
It’s amazing how more significant those lessons are (or at least feel) when the money is coming out of or going into “your own pocket.” Similar decisions at larger companies are generally easier, and (unfortunately) often made without the same degree of due diligence. Having more “skin in the game” does make a difference when it comes to decision-making and risk. I believe that this experience has made me a better leader, custodian of business, and employee – all because of this newfound understanding.
Businesses are usually started because someone is presented with a wonderful opportunity, or because they feel they have a great idea that will sell, or because they feel that they can make more money doing the same work on their own. Let me start by telling you that I believe the last reason is usually the worst reason to start a business. There is a lot of work to running a business, a lot of risk, and many expenses that most people never consider. You start a business because you are running toward something big, and not because you are running away from something.
I started my business because of a great opportunity. There were differences of opinion about growth at the small business I was working for at the time, and this gave me the opportunity to move in a direction that I was more interested in (shifting away from technical consulting and moving toward business/management consulting). Luckily, I had a customer (and now good friend) who believed in my potential and the value that I could bring to his business. He provided both the launch pad and safety net (via a three-month initial contract) that I needed to embark on this endeavor. For me, the most important lesson learned is to start a business for the right reasons.
More to come. And, if you have questions in the meantime, just leave a comment, and I will reply. Below are some of the statistics on Entrepreneurship that can be pretty enlightening:
Bureau of Labor Statistics stats on Entrepreneurship in the US
Diamonds or just Shiny Rocks?
During a candid review years ago, my boss at the time (the company’s CEO) made a surprising comment. During an executive meeting, he called a break and invited me to get a coffee with him. He said, “Good ideas can be like diamonds – drop them occasionally, and they have a lot of value. But sprinkle them everywhere you go, and they just become a bunch of shiny rocks.” This wasn’t the kind of feedback I expected, but it turned out to be both insightful and valuable.
For a long time, I have held the belief that there are four types of people at any company: 1) People who want to make things better; 2) People who are interested in improvement but only in a supporting role; 3) People who are mainly interested in themselves (they can do great things, but often at the expense of others); and 4) People that are just there and don’t care much about anything. This opinion is based on working and consulting at many companies over a few decades.
A recent Gallup Poll stated Worldwide only 13% of Employees are “engaged at work” (the rest are “not engaged” or “actively disengaged”). If true, this is a sad reflection of employees and work environments. Since it is a worldwide survey, it may be highly skewed by region or industry and, therefore, not indicative of what is typical across the board. Those results didn’t completely align with my thinking, but they were interesting nonetheless.
So, back to the story…
Before working at this company, I ran my own business for nearly a decade and consulted for 15 years, working with large corporations and startups. I am used to taking the best practices learned from other companies and engagements and incorporating them into our business practices to improve and foster growth. Efficiency was the key to growth and profitability.
I take a systemic view of business and see the importance of optimizing all components of “the business machine” to work harmoniously. Improvements in one area ultimately positively impact other areas of the business. From my naive perspective, I thought I was helping everyone by helping those with “easily solved problems.”
My perspective lacked one important thing. These were not easy problems to the other business leaders. They were struggling and asking for help. By providing an answer off the cuff, it made them look and feel bad in front of the rest of the team.
I learned that while trying to be helpful, I was insensitive to the fact that my “friendly suggestions based on past success” stepped on other people’s toes, creating frustration for those I intended to help. Providing simple solutions to their problems reflected poorly on my peers.
Suggestions and examples that were intended to be helpful had the opposite effect. Just as bad, it was probably just as frustrating for me to be ignored as it was for others to have me infringe on their part of the business. The resulting friction was very noticeable to my boss, which led to our unscheduled coffee break.
Those ideas (“diamonds”) may have been considered had I been an external consultant. But as part of the leadership team, I came across as someone only interested in myself (leaving “shiny rocks” lying around for people to ignore or possibly trip over).
Perception is reality, and my attempts to help were hurting me. Luckily, I received this honest and helpful feedback early in this position and was able to turn those perceptions around.
What are the morals of this story?
First, engaged people have the greatest potential to make a difference. Part of being a business leader is making sure you have the best possible team and creating an environment that challenges, motivates, and fosters growth and accountability.
Disengaged employees or people who are unwilling or unable to work with/collaborate with others may not be your best choices, regardless of their talent. They could actually be detrimental to the overall team dynamics. Understanding what drives someone from one category to another is a great first step in being sensitive while still staying effective.
Second, doing what you believe to be the right thing isn’t necessarily the best or right way to approach something. Being sensitive to the big picture and testing whether your input is being viewed as constructive was a big lesson for me. If you have good ideas but are ineffective, consider that your execution could be flawed. Self-awareness is very important.
Third, use your own examples as stories to help others understand potential solutions to problems in a non-threatening way. Let them connect the story to their own problems and find their own solutions. This helps them become more effective and allows them to save face. It is not a competition. And, if someone else has good ideas, help support them through collaboration. In the end, it should be more about effectiveness, growth, and achieving business goals than about who gets the credit.
While this seems like common sense now, my background and personal biases blinded me to that perspective.
My biggest lesson learned was about adaptation. There are many ways to be effective and make a difference. Focus on understanding the situation and its dynamics to employ the best techniques, which is ultimately critical to the team or organization’s success.
- ← Previous
- 1
- …
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next →
Where Ideas, Experiences, and Lessons Learned Intersect 